Clear View West, LLC v. Steinberg, Hall & Associates, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CLEAR VIEW WEST, LLC, Case No. 23-cv-04774-SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING THE STEINBERG
v. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL STEINBERG, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 51 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is a motion to disqualify plaintiff’s counsel Frederick Page, and by extension his firm and co-counsel, filed by the Steinberg defendants. Dkt. No. 52. Plaintiff opposes. Dkt. No. 52. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court found this matter appropriate fort resolution without oral argument and VACATED the hearing scheduled for March 29, 2024. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES defendants’ motion. 18 BACKGROfUND2 I. The 2013 Lawsuit and Arbitration On August 30, 2013, Holland & Knight LLP (“H&K”)3 was retained by Clear View West, LLC (“CVW”) and Samuel Steinberg (“Steinberg”) of Steinberg, Hall & Associates, Inc., dba Home 23…