Jaiyeola

Jaiyeola v. AT&T

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20245:23-cv-05182California2,829 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, Case No. 5:23-cv-05182-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO

DISMISS; DENYING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO AMEND

T-MOBILE US, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 38, 45, 88 Defendants.

Pro se1 Plaintiff, Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola (“Jaiyeola”), filed the present false advertising action against Defendants AT&T Mobility, LLC (“AT&T”), Verizon Communications. Inc. (“Verizon”), Apple Inc. (“Apple”), and T-Mobile U.S. (“T-Mobile”) (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the federal Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and California false advertising law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500, et seq. First Am Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 18. Before the Court are three motions to dismiss (“MTD”) filed by AT&T (joined by Verizon), Apple, and T-Mobile, as well as Jaiyeola’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (“SAC”). T-Mobile MTD, ECF No. 28; Apple MTD, ECF No. 38;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.