In Re: Da Vinci Surgical Robot Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20243:21-cv-03825California4,643 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE: DA VINCI SURGICAL ROBOT Case No. 21-cv-03825-AMO

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

OMNIBUS ORDER RE: SEALING

10

12 Before the Court are the Parties’ and Third-Parties’ Administrative Motions to Seal, Motions to Consider Sealing Third-Party Materials, Statements in Support of Sealing, Declarations in Support of Sealing, and associated exhibits, at ECF 125, 128, 129, 130, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, 139, 143, 150, 152, 155, 165, 168, 170, 171, 179, 180, 182, 186, 187. The Court, having carefully considered the submissions, the record, the applicable law, and any arguments related thereto, hereby orders that the Administrative Motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. LEGAL STANDARD Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, the party seeking to file a document or portions of it under seal must explain “(i) the legitimate private or public interests that warrant sealing; (ii) the injury that will result if sealing is denied; and (iii) why a less restrictive alternative to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.