Rugila

Rugila v. Mayorkas

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20243:24-cv-01218California956 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARLA RUGILA, et al., Case No. 24-cv-01218-MMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS OF

v. PLAINTIFFS MARONI, PORTO,

VAREJAO, AND JANSSON FOR

ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., LACK OF VENUE Defendants.

12 Before the Court is plaintiffs' "Response to Court's Order to Show Cause; Opposition to Dismissal for Improper Venue," filed March 28, 2024, whereby plaintiffs respond to the Court's Order of March 12, 2024 ("March 12 Order"), in which plaintiffs were directed to show cause why the claims of four of the five plaintiffs should not be dismissed for lack of venue. Plaintiffs are five individuals, specifically, Carla Rugila ("Rugila"), Hanri Marcell Surian Maroni ("Maroni"), Claudia Regina Cinti Correa Porto ("Porto"), Marcio Campos Chouin Varejao ("Varejao"), and Eduardo Luis Jansson ("Jansson"), who seek an order directing the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ("USCIS") to issue a …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.