Rose

Rose v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20243:23-cv-01191California5,229 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division T.R., Case No. 23-cv-01191-LB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND GRANTING

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

SECURITY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT

15 Defendant. Re: ECF Nos. 12, 16 16 INTRODUCTION The plaintiff seeks judicial review of the final decision by the defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security Administration, denying him Social Security Income disability benefits.1 The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) determined that the plaintiff, considering his age, education, work experience, and residual functional capacity, was “capable of making a successful adjustment to other work that exists in significant numbers in the national economy” and was not disabled.2 The plaintiff moved for summary judgment and the Commissioner opposed the motion 24

26 1 Mot. –…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.