Stricklin

Stricklin v. Glazer

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20243:23-cv-04870California543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LEE A STRICKLIN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-04870-MMC

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTIONS FOR DISQUALIFICATION

AND FOR RECONSIDERATION

J H GLAZER, et al., Defendants.

12 By order filed January 4, 2024, the Court granted defendants' respective motions to dismiss the Complaint in the above-titled action and afforded plaintiff Alivia J. Stricklin ("Stricklin"), who proceeds pro se, leave to file a First Amended Complaint ("FAC") no later than February 2, 2024. By order filed February 7, 2024, the Court dismissed the instant action, as Strickland had not filed an FAC. The Court is now in receipt of the following documents, each filed by Stricklin on March 28, 2024: (1) "Chief Justice San Francisco Notice of Motion and Motion for Disqualification of Subject Justice 28 U.S.C. Statute 455" ("Motion for Disqualification"); (2) "Plaintiff's Appeal Brief Opposition to Dismiss, Amendment, and Case Management FRCP…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.