Beijing Meishe Network Technology Co., Ltd. v. TikTok Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 BENING MEISHE NETWORK Case No. 23-cv-06012-SI TECHNOLOGY CoO., LTD., Plaintiff, ORDER LISTING QUESTIONS FOR THE PARTIES TO ADDRESS AT THE Vv. APRIL 5, 2024 HEARING TIKTOK INC., et al., ° Defendants. 9 This case is set for a hearing on defendants’ renewed motion to dismiss plaintiffs third amended complaint on April 5, 2024. The Court issues this order to provide the parties with advance || notice of questions that the Court would like the parties to address at the April 5, 2024 hearing. 1. For both parties: Why is plaintiff's Lanham Act claim cognizable or not cognizable under Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003) and OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc. v. W. Worldwide Servs., Inc., 897 F.3d 1008 (9th Cir. 2018)? a 2. For plaintiff: Why does Slep-Tone Entm’t Corp. v. Wired for Sound Karaoke & DJ…