Edwards
Edwards v. California Supreme Court
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MYEISHA M. EDWARDS, Case No. 23-cv-02253-AMO
Plaintiff,
SECOND SCREENING ORDER
v. UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915
CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff Myeisha M. Edwards is proceeding in this case in forma pauperis (IFP). ECF 9. The Court previously screened her First Amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and ordered Edwards to file an amended complaint that addressed certain deficiencies identified by the Court as to the basis for its subject matter jurisdiction. Id. Edwards has since sought appellate review of the Court’s order (ECF 10), which was dismissed (ECF 12). Edwards then filed the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). ECF 21. The Court remains under a continuing duty to dismiss a case filed without the payment of the filing fee whenever it determines that “the action or appeal (i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii)…