Jain

Jain v. Unilodgers, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20243:21-cv-09747California3,265 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHIPRA JAIN, Case No. 21-cv-09747-TSH

Plaintiff,

PUBLIC VERSION OF ORDER AT

v. ECF NO. 103

UNILODGERS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 74 Defendants.

12 To understand this order you should first read the Court’s February 7, 2024 Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause (“TRO”) at ECF No. 91. The TRO set forth the relevant legal standards and governing case law. The Court does not repeat those legal citations here but assumes the reader’s familiarity with them.1 To briefly recap, following a motion to dismiss, Plaintiff Shipra Jain’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) alleges breach of contract against Unilodgers, Inc., breach of fiduciary duty against Unilodgers and Vaibhav Verma, conversion against Verma, and declaratory relief against Unilodgers. ECF Nos. 45, 50. Because the requested preliminary injunction would have to run against Unilodgers in order to be effective, let’s remind ourselves what…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.