Katz-Lacabe

Katz-Lacabe v. Oracle America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20243:22-cv-04792California3,788 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL KATZ-LACABE, et al., Case No. 22-cv-04792-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING SEALING

ORACLE AMERICA, INC., MOTIONS

13 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION In this putative data privacy class action, Plaintiffs aver Defendant Oracle America, Inc.’s collection and use of internet users’ personal data violates their right to privacy as enshrined in the California Constitution and various state and federal privacy statutes. Oracle now moves to dismiss two causes of action in the Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“SAC”): (1) the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (“ECPA”) (Federal Wiretap Act) claim and (2) the intrusion upon seclusion claim premised on Florida common law. Both parties have also filed administrative motions to seal portions of their sur-reply briefs. For the reasons that follow, Oracle’s motion to dismiss is granted. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.