Batiste
Batiste v. City of Richmond
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAVID BATISTE, Case No. 22-cv-01188-AMO
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING RULE 60 MOTION
v. FOR RELIEF FROM ORDER
CITY OF RICHMOND, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 130 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Hugo Mendoza’s Rule 60 motion for relief from the Court’s November 27, 2023 order on Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for June 6, 2024 is VACATED. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). This Order assumes familiarity with the facts of the case, the parties’ arguments, the relevant law, as well as the Court’s November 27, 2023 order. ECF 124. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby DENIES the motion for the following reasons. Rule 60(b)(1) allows relief where “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect” led to the…