Amador

Amador v. Holland Residential, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20243:23-cv-02117California637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division CHEVEYO AMADOR, Case No. 23-cv-02117-LB

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS

AGAINST JAMIE WESSELS

v. Re: ECF No. 39 HOLLAND RESIDENTIAL, LLC, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Cheveyo Amador sued his former employer Holland Residential for wrongful termination (in retaliation for his complaints about unsafe working conditions) and missed rest breaks, in violation of state law. After the defendant removed the case to federal court, he sought leave to amend his complaint to add his supervisor Jamie Wessels as a defendant. Holland contends that she is not liable for the wrongful-termination claims because she is not an employer, and she is not liable for missed rest breaks because she is not a managing agent. The court grants Holland’s motion on these grounds. The court’s earlier order describes the plaintiff’s work history with Holland, including his job as a maintenance employee, his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.