Chang
Chang v. Cashman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STACY CHANG, Case No. 22-cv-02010-AMO (DMR)
Plaintiff,
ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY
v. LETTER
CARLOS CASHMAN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 82 Defendants.
The parties filed a joint discovery letter in which Plaintiff Stacy Chang moves to compel Defendants Carlos Cashman; Arrowside Ventures, LLC; Arrowside Capital, LLC; Arrowside Fund GP, LLC; and Cashman Family Investments II, LLC to respond to a single request for production (“RFP”). [Docket No. 82.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion to compel is denied. I. BACKGROUND This case stems from an employment dispute between Plaintiff and Defendant Cashman. Plaintiff alleges that she “is an accomplished professional in the venture capital industry.” She joined Founders Fund in 2017 where she worked as Chief of Staff. [Docket No. 109 (Second Am. Compl., “SAC”) ¶¶ 1, 33.] In January…