Peter Schuman v. Microchip Technology Incorporated

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PETER SCHUMAN, et al., Case No. 16-cv-05544-HSG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DIRECTING SUBMISSION OF

v. PROPOSED FORM OF JUDGMENT

AGAINST NAMED PLAINTIFFS AND

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY STAYING CASE INCORPORATED, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 189 Defendants.

12 In August 2023, the Court found that the releases signed by the two named Plaintiffs, Peter Schuman and William Coplin, were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, and accordingly granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to these two Plaintiffs. See Dkt. No. 185.1 The Court otherwise denied the motion, and noted that it was unclear how this class action could proceed without the two named Plaintiffs. Id. at 18, 24. Accordingly, the Court ordered the parties to show cause why the class should not be decertified based on the individualized inquiry necessary to assess the validity of the releases signed by the majority of the class members. Id. The…