Flodin

Flodin v. Central Garden & Pet Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20244:21-cv-01631California1,316 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN FLODIN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01631-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO

FILE MATERIAL UNDER SEAL

CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANY, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 139, 147, 155, 167 11 Defendants.

12 Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ motions to file under seal material designated by Defendants as confidential. ECF Nos. 139, 147, 155, 167. The Court will deny the motion filed at ECF No. 139, and grant in part and deny in part the motions filed at ECF Nos. 147, 155, and 167. I. BACKGROUND ECF No. 139 seeks to seal material filed in connection with Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ motion for leave to file a third-party complaint. After reviewing Defendants’ statement in support of sealing, ECF No. 144, the Court found “the request, at a minimum, to be insufficiently narrowly tailored” and allowed Defendants an opportunity to “request a more narrow sealing order.” ECF No. 151 at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.