Austin v. Georgetown University

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20243:24-cv-00260California1,460 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 4:24-cv-00260-DMR(EJD)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

WITHDRAW CONSENT TO

v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JURISDICTION

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.

Pro se Plaintiff, George J. Austin (“Austin”), brings this action against Defendants Georgetown University (“the University”) and District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers alleging racial discrimination in violation of the U.S. Constitution, as well as negligence and breach of contract. See Compl., ECF No. 1; Am. Compl., ECF No. 14. Austin’s case is currently before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. See Austin Consent to Magistrate Jurisdiction, ECF No. 3. Before this Court is a motion to withdraw consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Mot., ECF No. 28. The University has filed an opposition, and Austin has filed a reply. Opp’n, ECF No. 32; Reply, ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.