Austin v. Georgetown University

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20243:24-cv-00260California635 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 24-cv-00260-DMR

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AND

v. DEFENDANT GEORGETOWN

UNIVERSITY’S PENDING MOTION

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, et al., FOR SANCTIONS Defendants.

Self-represented Plaintiff George Jarvis Austin filed the complaint against Defendant Georgetown University (“Georgetown”) on January 16, 2024. He filed a consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction on January 20, 2024. [Docket No. 3.] He filed a third amended complaint on March 13, 2024 that adds District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers as a defendant. The court ordered Plaintiff to explain in writing why his claim(s) against Judge Gonzalez Rogers should not be dismissed based on judicial immunity. [Docket Nos. 14, 19 (Order to Show Cause, “OSC”).] Plaintiff then filed a declination to magistrate judge jurisdiction. [Docket No. 22.] The court ordered Plaintiff to file any motion to withdraw consent by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.