Langham

Langham v. City of Union City

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20244:23-cv-01753California1,207 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MALIK LANGHAM, Case No. 23-cv-01753-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS THIRD AMENDED

COMPLAINT

CITY OF UNION CITY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendants.

14 Now before the Court is the motion to dismiss the third amended complaint filed by Defendant City of Union City, Justin Noyd, Matthew Mangan, Kyle Scarbrough, Brian Ross, and Brian Baumgartner (collectively “Defendants”). Defendants move to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on the grounds that the third amended complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Having considered the parties’ papers and authority, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND This case arises from an alleged search and seizure of Plaintiff’s vehicle after a traffic stop with Union City police on October 30, 2022. Plaintiff alleges that police officers targeted him in the past and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.