Tolbert
Tolbert v. Colley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOEL TOLBERT, Case No. 22-cv-02026-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
v. PROTECTIVE ORDER SHOULD NOT
BE ENTERED; DENYING MOTION
ANTIOCH POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., FOR SANCTIONS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No.
This is a civil rights action filed by a California prisoner proceeding without an attorney. Defendants are the Antioch Police Department (“APD”), APD Chief Allan Cantando, and APD Officers James Colley and James Perkinson. Defendants have filed a second motion for a protective order (ECF No. 73), and Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions (ECF No. 68), which Defendants oppose (ECF No. 70). 1. Protective Order Defendants’ prior motion for a protective order (ECF No. 63) was denied because they did not show they had satisfied the meet-and-confer requirement or Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 64.) Defendants have filed a new motion for entry of a protective…