The Travelers Indemnity Company v. Lexington Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20245:23-cv-02252California2,361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY Case No. 23-cv-02252-BLF

COMPANY,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY 9 v. [Re: ECF No. 52]

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY,

et al.,

Defendants.

13 Plaintiff The Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers”) seeks declaratory relief against Lexington Insurance Company (“Lexington”) and American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company (“AGLIC”) regarding the priority of coverage of various insurers’ duty to indemnify J.T. Magen & Company, Inc. and JTM Construction Group Inc. (collectively, “JTM”) in the ongoing personal injury action entitled Castro v. Equinix, Inc., et al., Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. 21-CV-381946 (the “Underlying Action”). ECF No. 49 (“SAC”).1 On March 12, 2024, AGLIC filed a Motion to Stay Action Pending Final Judgment in Castro v. Equinix, Inc., et al. ECF No. 52 (“Mot.”); ECF No. 57 (“Reply”). According to AGLIC, “the Castro…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.