Broussard

Broussard v. Dole Packaged Foods, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20244:23-cv-03320California9,889 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHAMEA BROUSSARD, et al., Case No. 23-cv-03320-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND

GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

DOLE PACKAGED FOODS, LLC, TO STAY Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 24,

12 Pending before the Court are two motions filed by Defendant Dole Packaged Foods, LLC: a motion to dismiss and a motion to stay discovery. Dkt. Nos. 24, 36. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss, and GRANTS the motion to stay discovery. I. BACKGROUND On July 3, 2023, Shamea Broussard and Michael Schirano (“Plaintiffs”) brought a consumer class action complaint against Dole Packaged Foods, LLC (“Defendant” or “Dole”) concerning their labeling of various fruit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.