Beulah

Beulah v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20245:24-cv-00205California3,110 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DARYL ANTHONY BEULAH, Case No. 24-cv-00205-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. AMEND COMPLAINT; OF SERVICE;

DENYING MOTION FOR

R. BROOMFIELD, et al., APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 8,

12 Plaintiff, a prisoner at San Quentin State Prison (SQSP)1, filed a pro se civil rights action in state court. Defendants removed this action from state court and paid the filing fee. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff has sought to amend the complaint, which Defendants have not opposed. Dkt. No. 12, 11, 13. Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint (Dkt. No. 12) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s amended complaint (Dkt. No. 12) is before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, and service of the complaint on Defendants is ordered. Plaintiff will be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (for purposes other than the filing fee) by separate order. DISCUSSION A. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.