DOE 1 v. GitHub, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 J. DOE 1, et al., Case No. 22-cv-06823-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

GITHUB, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 218 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 218, of the Court’s prior order, ECF No. 189. The Court’s prior order dismissed Plaintiffs’ claims under Sections 1202(b)(1) and 1202(b)(3) of the DMCA with leave to amend. It also dismissed Plaintiffs’ state law claims for intentional and negligent interference with prospective economic relations, unjust enrichment, negligence, and unfair competition with prejudice. Id. The Court will deny the motion for reconsideration. The Court possesses the inherent authority to reconsider its interlocutory orders at any point before it enters final judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Amarel v. Connell, 102 F.3d 1494, 1515 (9th Cir. 1996). Typically, a motion for reconsideration should be granted only if “the …