Lafrades

Van Huisen v. Lafrades

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20245:23-cv-04800California1,385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN, Case No. 23-cv-04800-PCP

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND, AND

GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED

ERIC LAFRADES, IN FORMA PAUPERIS Defendant. Re: Dkt. No.

12 Gregory Van Huisen, an inmate at the Mule Creek State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Complaint is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Mr. Van Huisen’s Complaint is dismissed because it does not state a claim for relief. I. BACKGROUND Under “Statement of Claim,” Mr. Van Huisen writes the following:

18 Constructive treason; can be construed as a trespass case. In light of perspective a landmark case. Companion case, Van Huisen v. House of Representatives; 525 U.S. 316 1999 Department of Census v. H.O.R., case in point civil conspiracy, and election contest ([illegible]) was given property to hold, treacherous…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.