Montes

Montes v. Capital One Financial Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20245:23-cv-04052California1,476 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 OMAR MONTES, Case No. 23-cv-04052-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL [Re: ECF No. 27]

ASSOCIATION,

11 Defendant. 12 Before the Court is Defendant Capitol One, National Association’s (“Capitol One”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Omar Montes’ Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 27 (“Mot.”); ECF No. 34 (“Reply”). Plaintiff opposes. ECF No. 32 (“Opp.”). The Court held a hearing on April 11, 2024, during which the Court issued oral rulings. ECF No. 36. The Court here summarizes those oral rulings. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint alleges that he “applied for a Quicksilver credit card on Capital One’s website in December 2022 after receiving a targeted offer on Instagram that offered a cash sign-up bonus.” ECF No. 26 (“SAC”) ¶ 25. Plaintiff alleges that the targeted offer “stated that Capital One offered a $200…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.