Sigari

Sigari v. Banasik

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20245:24-cv-01816California437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 HANIEH SIGARI, et al., Case No. 24-cv-01816-EJD

Plaintiffs, ORDER REGARDING LIMITED

RECEIVERSHIP OF PLAINTIFF

v. QYRAL, LLC; DIRECTING PARTIES

TO FILE JOINT PROPOSED ORDER

DARIUSZ BANASIK, et al., APPOINTING KEVIN A. SINGER TO

LIMITED RECEIVERSHIP

Defendants.

14 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Emergency Motion (the “Motion”) for 15 Appointment of Receiver for Plaintiff Qyral, LLC (“Qyral”). See Mot., ECF No. 25. Plaintiffs 16 oppose the Motion in part, agreeing that a receivership is warranted but disputing the scope of the 17 receivership and the choice of receiver. See Opp’n, ECF No. 29. 18 With respect to the scope of the receivership, the Court concurs with the parties—as 19 discussed at the April 9, 2024 hearing in this matter—that a receivership is necessary to ensure 20 that Qyral remains a going concern, particularly in light of the parties’ assertions that the other has 21 engaged in improper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.