Sigari
Sigari v. Banasik
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 HANIEH SIGARI, et al., Case No. 24-cv-01816-EJD
Plaintiffs, ORDER REGARDING LIMITED
RECEIVERSHIP OF PLAINTIFF
v. QYRAL, LLC; DIRECTING PARTIES
TO FILE JOINT PROPOSED ORDER
DARIUSZ BANASIK, et al., APPOINTING KEVIN A. SINGER TO
LIMITED RECEIVERSHIP
Defendants.
14 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Emergency Motion (the “Motion”) for 15 Appointment of Receiver for Plaintiff Qyral, LLC (“Qyral”). See Mot., ECF No. 25. Plaintiffs 16 oppose the Motion in part, agreeing that a receivership is warranted but disputing the scope of the 17 receivership and the choice of receiver. See Opp’n, ECF No. 29. 18 With respect to the scope of the receivership, the Court concurs with the parties—as 19 discussed at the April 9, 2024 hearing in this matter—that a receivership is necessary to ensure 20 that Qyral remains a going concern, particularly in light of the parties’ assertions that the other has 21 engaged in improper…