Vitale
Vitale v. State of California Franchise Tax Board
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRANCESCO VITALE, Case No. 23-cv-06039-RFL
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE
TAX BOARD, et al., Defendants.
Plaintiff Francesco Vitale, who is proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against Defendants U.S. Deputy Assistant Attorney General David Hubbert and the California Franchise Tax Board on November 21, 2023. (Dkt. No. 1.) On February 12, 2024, the United States filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Dkt. No. 5.) On February 23, 2024, the California Franchise Tax Board filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Dkt. No. 7.) Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss filed by the United States was due on February 26, 2024, and his opposition to the motion to dismiss filed by the California Franchise Tax Board was due on March 8, 2024. Plaintiff did not file any opposition to the motions to dismiss. Nor did Plaintiff…