Rhodes

Rhodes v. California Department of Parks and Recreation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20245:23-cv-00341California177 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 SHAWN RHODES, Case NO: 5:23-cv-00341 NC Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Dkt. No.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS

AND RECREATION, and others, Defendants.

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that 16 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 19 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 60 days. All scheduled dates are |} VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 60 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 || Dated: April 17, 2024 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.