Prokopenko

Viral DRM LLC v. Prokopenko

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20243:24-cv-00739California1,473 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VIRAL DRM LLC, Case No. 3:24-cv-00739-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR ALERNATIVE SERVICE

YURII PROKOPENKO, Re: Dkt. No. 14 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Viral DRM LLC syndicates and licenses video content of extreme weather events from around the world. Defendant, a citizen of Ukraine, allegedly downloaded and copied Plaintiff’s copyrighted materials from YouTube, and then re-uploaded infringing versions of Plaintiff’s copyrighted media content to his YouTube channel(s). Plaintiff seeks leave to serve Defendant via email and posting on a designated website. (Dkt. No. 14.) After carefully considering Plaintiff’s motion and the relevant legal authority, the Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the motion for alternative service. BACKGROUND Viral DRM alleges Yurii Prokopenko operates the YouTube Channels…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.