Patel

Patel v. Alphabet Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20245:23-cv-03647California1,745 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 RAJ PATEL, Case No. 23-cv-03647-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCREENING SIXTH

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER

U.S.C. § 1915

ALPHABET INC., et al., [Re: ECF No. 57] Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Raj Patel’s sixth amended complaint against Defendants Alphabet, Inc., XXVI Holdings, Inc., Google, LLC, Jigsaw, LLC, Sundar Pichai, and the United States. ECF No. 57 (“SAC”). The Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on August 7, 2023. ECF No. 16. After sua sponte reviewing the sixth amended complaint, the Court DISMISSES the SAC with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND A. Sixth Amended Complaint Plaintiff alleges that in August 2022, he used Google Search, hoping to find the varna and caste information of Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Rishi Sunak. SAC ¶ 8. Google Search did not display any results with this information. Id. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.