Hayden

Hayden v. Bob's Red Mill Natural Foods, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20244:23-cv-03862California7,808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARK HAYDEN, Case No. 23-cv-03862-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND

REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

BOB'S RED MILL NATURAL FOODS, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 17, 18 11 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Bob’s Red Mill Natural Foods, Inc.’s motion to dismiss and its request for judicial notice. Dkt. Nos. 17, 18. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion and the associated request for judicial notice. I. BACKGROUND On August 1, 2023, Plaintiff Mark Hayden (“Plaintiff”) filed a putative class action complaint against Bob’s Red Mill Natural Foods, Inc. (“Defendant”) concerning its allegedly deceptive marketing of its Whole Ground Flaxseed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.