Mullins

Mullins v. International Brotherhood Teamsters

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20243:23-cv-03939California1,431 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMSA NEAL MULLINS, et al., Case No. 23-cv-03939-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO RECONSIDER

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, et al., Docket No. 61 11 Defendants. 12 13 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider. Specifically, Plaintiffs ask the Court to reconsider that part of its order on Defendants’ motions to dismiss in which it dismissed with prejudice (1) the LMRDA claim and (2) the state law wage claims. Having considered the parties’ briefs, the Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. Plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider is DENIED. I. DISCUSSION A. Claim for Violation of the LMRDA (Count 2) The LMRDA claim is pled against the Union Defendants only. In their complaint, Plaintiffs alleged that the Union Defendants violated the LMRDA because Plaintiffs asked the Union Defendants for a copy of the collective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.