Synopsys, Inc. v. Siemens Industry Software Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20243:20-cv-04151California11,016 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 Case No. 20-cv-04151-WHO

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO v. EXCLUDE 10 SIEMENS INDUSTRY SOFTWARE INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 323, 324, 337, 339, 341, 349, 354, 362, 364, Defendant. 367 12 Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. moves for summary judgment on defendant Siemens Industry, 13 Inc.’s eleventh affirmative defense of non-infringement based on the scope of the parties’ Patent 14 License and Settlement Agreement (“PLSA”) as determined in mandatory arbitration. Dkt. No. 15 316. Synopsys also moves to exclude in full the opinions Siemens’s experts Dr. Stephen Melvin 16 and Dr. Marilyn Wolf. Dkt. No. 321. Siemens moves for summary judgment of non-infringement 17 of the two patents left at issue (the 614 Patent and the 915 Patent) and moves to limit the amount 18 of possible damages. Siemens also moves to exclude the opinions of Synopsys’s expert John. L. 19…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.