McMillian

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 COURTNEY MCMILLIAN, et al., Case No. 23-cv-03461-TLT (RMI)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE

v. MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY

ELON MUSK, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 61 Defendants.

13 Now pending before the court is Defendants’ motion seeking a stay of discovery pending the resolution of Defendants’ motion to dismiss. See Defs.’ Mot. (dkt. 61) at 2-6. Plaintiffs have responded (dkt. 66), and Defendants have replied (dkt. 71). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. In essence, Defendants contend that their motion to dismiss (dkt. 38) Plaintiffs’ amended complaint is potentially dispositive of the entire case, and that the dismissal motion can be decided without further discovery – accordingly, Defendants submit that a stay of discovery pending the resolution of that…