Zeman

Zeman v. Twitter, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20243:23-cv-01786California4,186 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 JOHN ZEMAN, Case No. 23-cv-01786-SI

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

TWITTER, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 54 Defendants.

11 Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint. Dkt. No. 54. Plaintiff opposes. Dkt. No. 59. In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule , the Court finds that the matter may adequately be determined on the papers and accordingly VACATES the hearing set for April 19, 2024. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES defendants’ motion.1 17 BACKGROUND2 Plaintiff John Zeman is a former employee of defendant Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”). Dkt. No. 50 (“FAC”) ¶ 6. Plaintiff alleges that Twitter unlawfully discriminated against him and other employees aged fifty or older based on age, and that defendant X Corp. (“X”) has “successor liability for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.