Medina

Medina v. Monterey County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 20245:24-cv-00053California1,443 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NATHAN MEDINA, et al., Case No. 24-cv-00053-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS FOR

LEAVE TO FILE SETTLEMENT

COUNTY OF MONTEREY, et al., PETITIONS UNDER SEAL Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 31, 32]

12 Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ administrative motions for leave to file the settlement petitions of minors M.M. and N.M. under seal. ECF Nos. 31, 32. No party has filed an opposition to the motions. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motions. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). Consequently, access to motions and their attachments that are “more than…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.