KJ-Park, LLC v. Match Group, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20245:23-cv-02346California1,796 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KJ-PARK, LLC, Case No. 23-cv-02346-VKD

Plaintiff,

FURTHER ORDER RE DISCOVERY

v. DISPUTE RE PRIVILEGE CLAIMS

MATCH GROUP, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 55, 74, 78 Defendants.

13 Following this Court’s January 22, 2024 order (Dkt. No. 62), plaintiff KJ-Park, LLC (“KJ- Park”) and defendants Match Group, LLC and Match Group, Inc. (collectively, “Match”) continue to disagree regarding Match’s assertion that certain otherwise responsive documents are protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. See Dkt. Nos. 55, 74. Specifically, the parties disagree regarding whether communications that include non-party Jones Lange LaSalle Americas, Inc. (“JLL”) (and other third parties) properly may be withheld from production as privileged or protected materials. Dkt. No. 74 at 1. The following 19 privilege log entries remain in dispute: 22 No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.