Boston Retirement System v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BENJAMIN STIRRATT, et al., Case No. 19-cv-06361-RS (DMR)
Plaintiffs,
AMENDED ORDER ON JOINT
v. DISCOVERY LETTER AND RELATED
SEALING MOTIONS
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 394, 395, 419, 435 Defendants.
This amends Docket No. 443 by adding a correction to the court’s order on the Second Motion to Seal, page 12, line 10. The parties filed a joint discovery letter in which Lead Plaintiff Boston Retirement System (“BRS”) seeks to compel production of 12 documents listed on the privilege log of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) over which Uber asserts claims of attorney-client privilege (the “Uber Documents”). [Docket No. 394 (Joint Disc. Letter, “JDL”).] The court granted Plaintiff’s request for in camera review and ordered Uber to lodge unredacted versions of the Uber Documents and provide evidence in the form of declarations sworn under penalty of perjury to support its assertions of privilege. [Docket…