Geisler
Geisler v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL GEISLER, Case No. 24-cv-01059-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
v. TO REMAND
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff Daniel Geisler sues Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) for claims related to his alleged wrongful termination. (Dkt. No. 3-2.) Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand. (Dkt. No. 16.) Having carefully considered the briefing, the Court concludes oral argument is unnecessary, see Civ. L. R. 7-1(b), and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. Defendant has met its burden to demonstrate the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter based on diversity by showing the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is legally impaired in his left eye. (Dkt. No. 3-2 ¶ 13.) UPS hired Plaintiff in May 2020 as a Personal Vehicle Delivery Driver, a seasonal position requiring a California Class C driver’s…