Redeaux

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARY ANN REDEAUX, et al., Case No. 24-cv-01979-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE AMENDED COMPLAINT

v.

NOEL WISE, et al., Docket No. 8 Defendants.

12 13 Previously, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) but dismissed their complaint with leave to amend. See Docket No. 6 (order) (conducting review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)). Plaintiffs have timely filed an amended complaint. The Court again reviews the pleading pursuant to § 1915(e). Though Plaintiffs have made some changes to their original complaint, the amended complaint does not address the deficiencies identified by the Court in its prior order. To the extent Plaintiffs suggest that the Court lacks authority to adjudicate their case because they did not “consent [to] a lesser judge,” Docket No. 23 (amended complaint) (ECF Page 23), the Court rejects the argument. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and…