Fortinet, Inc. v. Forescout Technologies, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FORTINET, INC., Case No. 20-cv-03343-EMC (TSH)

Plaintiff,

DISCOVERY ORDER

v. Re: Dkt. Nos. 234, 238 FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

12 Forescout has moved to compel Fortinet to provide Rule 30(b)(6) testimony regarding certain topics, about which Fortinet’s 30(b)(6) designee William Cooper, an in-house attorney, declined to provide testimony during his January 22, 2024 deposition. Topic 20. Fortinet designated Cooper on Topic 20 (“All offers to sell or license the Fortinet Patents-In-Suit, including the circumstances pertaining to such offers to sell or license, the persons involved in the discussions concerning such offers, the result of such offers to sell or license, the reasons for which any offers to sell or license the Fortinet Patents-In-Suit did not result or have not yet resulted in an actual sale or license, and the types of documentation generated in connection with such offers to sell or license.”). ECF Nos. 234-1 &…