Harris

Harris v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20244:21-cv-00283California4,631 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAURICE LYDELL HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-00283-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING NUNC PRO

TUNC PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

v. AN EXTENSION OF TIME; DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

CLERIC MUHAMMAD (K. FASISH), et TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER al., AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 39, 41 12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Corcoran State Prison (“CSP-Corcoran”), filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and preliminary injunction (“PI”) that would require Defendants to place him back on the Religious Meat Alternate Program diet and prohibit Defendants from retaliating against him for filing this action. Dkt. No. 39. Defendants have filed an opposition, Dkt. No. 40; and Plaintiff has filed a reply, Dkt. No. 42. Also pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for an extension of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.