Rothschild

Rothschild v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20243:24-cv-01099California953 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MAYER A. ROTHSCHILD, Case No. 24-cv-01099-TLT

Petitioner,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL;

v. DENYING CERTIFICATE OF

APPEALABILITY

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Respondents.

12 Petitioner filed this pro se action from San Mateo County jail seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He paid the filing fee. For the reasons set forth below, the petition will be dismissed and a certificate of appealability will be denied. DISCUSSION 1. Background Petitioner states that he was sentenced to 60 days jail on February 27, 2024, in San Mateo County Superior Court for failure to pay restitution for accepting a down payment above $1,000. He pleaded guilty and has filed no other petitions, applications, or motions with respect to the conviction in any state or federal court. Petitioner raises three claims. First, that he was bullied by seven different public defenders into taking a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.