Rhodes

Rhodes v. Ford

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20244:20-cv-03128California2,516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KAVIN MAURICE RHODES, Case No. 20-cv-03128-PJH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING SECOND

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

D. FORD, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 134, 135, 138 Defendants.

13 This is a civil rights case brought by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His claims arise from his detention at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”). In an order dated July 26, 2023, the court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion for summary judgment. See Dkt. 103. Specifically, the case proceeded on plaintiff’s retaliation claim against defendant Ford regarding an incident on January 16, 2020. The court concluded that plaintiff had raised a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Ford was made aware that he was the subject of plaintiff’s grievance and issued a false Rules Violation Report (“RVR”) as retaliation. See Dkt. 103. In particular, the court’s order cited an argument made in plaintiff’s opposition …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.