Johnson v. GigSmart, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SUSAN JOHNSON, et al., Case No. 24-cv-02233-TLT
Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
v. April 24, 2024, 11 a.m., D-9 GIGSMART, INC., [videoconference] Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. ECF, 6
13 On April 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order 14 and Order to Set Show Cause Hearing for Preliminary Injunction. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7- 15 3(a), Defendant’s opposition is due no later than April 24, 2024, at 11a.m. 16 Plaintiff served the Defendant on April 22, 2024, to date, has not filed an opposition or 17 statement of non-opposition. Failure of the opposing party to file a memorandum of points and 18 authorities in opposition to any motion may constitute consent to the granting of the motion. 19 The Court begins by analyzing whether it has jurisdiction to review the State Court 20 Judgment. 21 Pursuant to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, federal district courts lack subject matter 22 jurisdiction to exercise appellate review over…