One Fair Wage, Inc. v. Darden Restaurants Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ONE FAIR WAGE, INC., Case No. 21-cv-02695-EMC
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
DARDEN RESTAURANTS INC., Defendant. Docket No.
12 13 Currently pending before the Court is a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration filed by Plaintiff One Fair Wage, Inc. (“OFW”). Having considered the parties’ briefs, the Court hereby finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. OFW’s motion is DENIED. It has filed to satisfy any of the requirements of Civil Local Rule 7-9(b). For example: • OFW argues that there is a material difference in law compared to what was presented to the Court before it issued its order on statutory standing. See Civ. L.R. 7-9(b)(1). OFW cites to (1) a case, see McGhee v. Healthcare Servs. Group, No. 5:10-cv-279-RS-EMT, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126886 (N.D. Fla. Nov. 2,…