Synopsys, Inc. v. Sunlune Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SYNOPSYS, INC., Case No. 24-cv-00220-BLF Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING ON

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE

Vv. DEFENDANT’S ANSWER; GRANTING

MOTION TO STRIKE ANSWER; AND

SUNLUNE CORPORATION, SETTING DEADLINE FOR

DEFENDANT TO MAKE PROPER

Defendant. APPEARANCE THROUGH COUNSEL [Re: ECF 31]

Having reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant Sunlune Corporation’s Answer © (ECF 31), which is unopposed, as well as Plaintiff’s Reply (ECF 33), the Court orders as follows: (1) The motion is suitable for decision without oral argument, and the hearing

= || previously set for August 8, 2024 is VACATED. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b).

Z (2) The motion is GRANTED and Defendant’s answer (ECF 29) is STRICKEN. The || answer was filed by Defendant acting pro se. However, a corporate defendant cannot…