Hanson

Hanson v. Dulgov

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20243:24-cv-00664California888 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

13 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, filed this petition for a writ of 14 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the conditions of her confinement at the 15 Federal Correctional Institute in Dublin, California (“FCI Dublin”). She has paid the filing fee. 16 For the reasons discussed below, the petition is dismissed without prejudice.

BACKGROUND

18 Petitioner was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Idaho in 19 2021. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) She claims the conditions at FCI Dublin are harmful because of “toxic 20 substances of black mold, asbestos, natural gas leaks, dirty ventilation, lack of fresh food and 21 periodic brown drinking water,” as well as insufficient ventilation and heat. (Id. at 6, 9.) She also 22 claims she has received inadequate medical care for her “multiple comorbidities. (Id. at 6, 9-10.) 23 Petitioner requests “immediate release” from custody. (Id. at 7.)

DISCUSSION

25 Petitioner may not bring her claims in a petition for writ of habeas corpus because she is 26 challenging the conditions of her confinement, not her conviction or sentence. Federal law “opens 27 two main…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.