Dai
Dai v. Liu
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MENGYANG DAI, Case No. 24-cv-00356-VKD
Plaintiff, ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION TO DISMISS
v. COUNTERCLAIM AND (2)
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING
IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ERDAN LIU, et al., STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 10 13 Plaintiff Mengyang Dai filed this wage-and-hour action against defendants 3 Kingdoms, Inc. (“3 Kingdoms”)1 and Erdan Liu. Ms. Dai moves pursuant to Rule 12 to dismiss 3 Kingdoms’ fourth counterclaim and to strike several of defendants’ affirmative defenses. Dkt. No. 10. Defendants oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 13. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the oral arguments presented, the Court denies Ms. Dai’s motion to dismiss 3 Kingdoms’ fourth counterclaim and grants in part and denies in part her Rule 12(f) motion to strike affirmative…