Dai

Dai v. Liu

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 23, 20245:24-cv-00356California3,046 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MENGYANG DAI, Case No. 24-cv-00356-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION TO DISMISS

v. COUNTERCLAIM AND (2)

GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING

IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ERDAN LIU, et al., STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES 12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 10 13 Plaintiff Mengyang Dai filed this wage-and-hour action against defendants 3 Kingdoms, Inc. (“3 Kingdoms”)1 and Erdan Liu. Ms. Dai moves pursuant to Rule 12 to dismiss 3 Kingdoms’ fourth counterclaim and to strike several of defendants’ affirmative defenses. Dkt. No. 10. Defendants oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 13. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, as well as the oral arguments presented, the Court denies Ms. Dai’s motion to dismiss 3 Kingdoms’ fourth counterclaim and grants in part and denies in part her Rule 12(f) motion to strike affirmative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.