Davis

Davis v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20244:19-cv-05866California641 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GLORIA JEANETTE DAVIS, Case No. 19-cv-05866-HSG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO

v. REOPEN

KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, Re: Dkt. Nos. 74, 75 Defendant.

12 On February 2, 2022, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and entered judgment against Plaintiff Gloria Jeanette Davis. Dkt. Nos. 65, 66. On August 17, 2023, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the Court’s ruling. Dkt. No. 71. Plaintiff has since filed documents asking the Court to reopen her case and requesting trial or oral argument, which the Court construes as a motion to vacate the judgment under Rule 60(b). See Dkt. Nos. 74, 75. Rule 60(b) “provides an ‘exception to finality’ that ‘allows a party to seek relief from a final judgment, and request reopening of [her] case, under a limited set of circumstances.’” United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, 559 U.S. 260, 269 (2010) (citations omitted). Rule 60(b) provides for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.